SplashSol research · October 2026

Scottish Home-Service Enquiry Benchmark

We reviewed 40 public enquiry journeys across Scottish roofing, heating, glazing, kitchen, bathroom and construction businesses. The question was simple: after a prospective customer calls or submits an enquiry, can they see a clear next step?

40

Public journeys reviewed

Two outreach research batches completed on 27 and 28 October 2026.

36

No visible booking route

The recorded audit did not identify a way to reserve a callback, survey, visit or consultation.

3

Broken or unavailable journey

A researched contact URL failed or the website was unavailable during the audit.

These findings describe what was visible during a dated public audit. They do not measure the businesses’ private response process or service quality.

What the sample showed

Most Journeys Collected Contact Details Without Securing the Next Action

Forms frequently asked for a name, email, phone number and message. The audit found much less visible support for selecting a callback, survey or consultation time while the prospect was ready to proceed.

Some strong forms collected property or product details. Even then, the public journey often ended with a general promise that the team would respond rather than a defined next step.

Booking gap

The customer could enquire but could not visibly reserve the appropriate next action.

Unclear waiting period

Many journeys used broad wording such as “as soon as possible” or showed no response expectation.

Shallow qualification

General message boxes replaced job-specific questions that could prepare the first conversation.

Journey resilience

Three audits encountered a failed contact page or inaccessible website during inspection.

Method

How the Audit Was Conducted

01

Build the research pool

SplashSol collected 100 public Scottish home-service prospects across high-value trades.

02

Select two working batches

Forty businesses were selected across roofing, heating, glazing, kitchens, bathrooms, home improvement and construction.

03

Review the public path

The audit recorded the visible phone, email, form, stated response expectation, qualification and booking route. No form was submitted.

04

Write one observed gap

Each record contains a factual public-journey observation used to personalise outreach.

05

Aggregate consistent definitions

The benchmark counts a booking route only when the recorded journey visibly offered a callback, survey, visit or consultation reservation.

06

Preserve the limitation

The audit cannot see internal CRM activity, actual response time, conversion rates or private follow-up.

A Practical Enquiry-Journey Checklist

Confirm receipt

Tell the prospect what arrived and what will happen next.

Set an expectation

Publish a response window the operating team can actually meet.

Ask useful questions

Collect the minimum information required to choose the next action.

Secure the next step

Offer a callback, survey or consultation route when the rules allow it.

Define human handoff

Escalate ambiguity, risk, complaints, pricing and technical judgement.

Track the outcome

Connect enquiry source, response, appointment, quotation and reported win.

Compare Your Own Journey With the Benchmark

SplashSol will audit one live enquiry source and run the complete Lead Rescue service free for fourteen days, with setup included and no contract.

Apply for the Free 14-Day Pilot

Setup included during the pilot • No contract • One live enquiry source

Benchmark FAQs

What did SplashSol audit?
We reviewed the public enquiry journeys of 40 Scottish home-service businesses across roofing, heating, windows, kitchens, bathrooms, construction and related services.
Did SplashSol submit forms or make test calls?
No. The audit was limited to visible public journeys and recorded what a prospective customer could see without submitting personal information.
Does the audit measure actual response speed?
No. It records stated response expectations and visible booking or qualification routes. It does not claim to measure the private performance of each team.
Why are company names omitted?
The benchmark is intended to describe common journey patterns, not publicly score individual businesses.
Will the sample be updated?
Yes. Future editions can add dated audits while preserving the definitions used for comparison.